How does UV light disinfection work?

How does UV light disinfection work?

Ultraviolet irradiation

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation is the preferred method for disinfection of small supplies except

for larger schemes in which it is necessary to maintain a residual disinfectant during storage and

distribution. UV disinfection efficiency is particularly affected by water quality and flow rate. The

water to be disinfected must be of good quality and particularly low in colour and turbidity. It is

generally necessary for the turbidity of water to be less than 5 NTU, preferably much lower, for

successful UV disinfection. Therefore pre-filtration is necessary, especially if Cryptosporidium is

likely to be present, as discussed below.

Aquada UV Disinfection for a private water supply

Aquada UV Disinfection for a private water supply

How does UV light disinfection work?

Special lamps are used to generate UV radiation, and are enclosed in a reaction chamber made

of stainless steel or, less commonly, plastics. Low pressure mercury lamps, which generate 85% of

their energy at a wavelength of 254 nm, are most commonly used; their wavelength is in the

optimum germicidal range of 250 to 265 nm. These lamps are similar in design, construction and

operation to fluorescent tubes except that they are constructed of UV-transparent quartz instead of

phosphor-coated glass. The optimum operating temperature of the lamp is around 40 °C so the lamp

is normally separated from the water by a ‘sleeve’ to prevent cooling by the water. The intensity of

UV radiation emitted decreases with lamp age; typical lamp life is about 10 to 12 months after

which the output is about 70% of that of a new lamp, and lamp replacement is required.

Quartz Sleeve

The usual UV reactor configuration is a quartz-sleeved low pressure mercury lamp in direct

contact with the water; water enters the unit and flows along the annular space between the quartz

sleeve and the wall of the chamber. Other configurations include lamps separated from the water,

for example lamps surrounded by ‘bundles’ of PTFE tubes through which the water flows.

Disinfection will only be effective provided that a sufficient dose of UV is applied. The ‘dose’ of

UV radiation is expressed as an energy flux, in units of mW.s/cm2 (milliwatt seconds per square

centimetre), which is the product of the intensity given out by the lamp and the residence time of

water in the reactor. The minimum dose required for disinfection depends on several factors, including

the susceptibility of micro-organisms but is generally taken to be in the range 16 to 40 mW.s/cm2.

It is important, to ensure effective disinfection, that both residence time and UV intensity are

adequate. UV intensity will be diminished by ageing of the lamp, fouling of the lamp by deposits,

and absorption of UV radiation by water contaminants such as natural colour. For these reasons,

lamps need to be changed at the recommended intervals and the quartz sleeve may require periodic

cleaning. Some units incorporate a manual ‘wiper’ for cleaning whilst others incorporate automatic

mechanical cleaning.

Colour and turbidity

Colour and turbidity will both affect radiation intensity in the reactor and turbidity may protect

micro-organisms from the radiation. The water to be treated should be tested for transmissivity by

the manufacturer or supplier in order to estimate worst-case transmission values and to adjust

contact time accordingly. More advanced units incorporating UV monitors have the facility to

automatically adjust the energy input to the UV lamp to achieve the required UV intensity.

Flow rate

The water flow rate affects the retention time in the reactor, which is designed for a maximum

flow rate. The maximum water flow rate should not be exceeded.


There is evidence that UV is effective in inactivating Cryptosporidium provided that a

sufficient UV dose is applied although there is a dearth of data on effectiveness under high-risk

conditions of water quality. However, where Cryptosporidium is likely to be present and cyst

removal is required then pre-filtration capable of removing particles of 1 mm diameter is

recommended prior to UV disinfection. Pre-filtration provides an additional barrier to passage of

oocysts into the treated water, removes particles that shield micro-organisms from the UV light

and helps to reduce fouling of the UV lamp.


UV irradiation equipment is compact and simple to operate. Maintenance requirements are

modest, although specific systematic maintenance is essential. Other advantages include short

contact time and the absence of any known by-products of significance to health. An ‘overdose’ of

UV presents no danger and actually adds a safety factor. The principal disadvantage is the absence

of any residual effect, necessitating careful attention to hygiene in the storage and distribution


Hard Water Scale

The build-up of scale on the sleeves of the lamps will eventually reduce their transmittance and

they must be cleaned or replaced regularly. Some units have UV intensity monitors and alarms

which provide a continuous check on performance and these are strongly recommended. These

devices may prevent the flow of water if the required intensity of UV radiation is not achieved, for

example when the lamps are warming-up or because of scale formation. UV intensity monitors

may not be available on smaller units and it is therefore essential that the manufacturer’s

instructions regarding lamp warm-up, cleaning and replacement are followed to ensure optimal


Lamp replacement

Lamp replacement is usually a simple operation but may involve a significant downtime for

reactors with many lamps. This difficulty may be overcome by use of multiple units or by having

a treated water storage tank capable of maintaining supply whilst maintenance is carried out. The

materials of construction and design of storage systems should not allow deterioration in water

quality to occur.

Acknowledgement: The primary source of information whilst preparing this document is Drinking Water Regulator in Scotland (DWRS).

My water failed the Councils water test. What does it mean?

My water failed the Councils water test. What does it mean?

Failed Water Test

Water used as a source for a small supply of drinking water may be of unknown origin and
come from a catchment prone to consistent or intermittent contamination by faecal material from
domestic and farm animals, wildlife or sanitation systems such as septic tanks. As a consequence,
there is a high probability of pathogenic micro-organisms being present in the source water, and
adequate treatment must be applied before the water is used for domestic purposes. Because no
single treatment can be expected to remove all types of pathogenic agents, a multiple barrier
approach in the form of two or more sequential treatment processes is recommended.

Indicator Organisms

The microbiological quality of drinking water has traditionally been assessed by monitoring for
bacteria called faecal indicator organisms (coliforms, E. coli, and enterococci). The presence of
these organisms is indicative of past faecal contamination and hence the possible presence of
enteric pathogens. Although indicator organisms are generally adequate for monitoring purposes
they cannot completely be relied on to indicate the absence of pathogens. This is especially true
where a pathogen is environmentally more robust, or can survive treatment better than the
indicators. In these circumstances the indicator may be absent even though low numbers of
pathogens still remain.

E. coli as a measure of microbiological safety

Despite the possible shortcomings in the use of faecal indicators as a measure of the
microbiological safety of a water supply, monitoring for coliforms and E. coli is still recommended
and standards of quality are expressed in terms of these organisms. The reason for this is that
monitoring for the pathogens themselves remains rather uncertain because methods of analysis are
relatively insensitive and costly compared to those for faecal indicators. Additionally, the absence
of one pathogen will not guarantee the absence of others. Therefore E. coli and coliforms remain
the best and most sensitive general measure of water quality.


An example of a pathogen with which such a discrepancy can occur is the protozoan parasite
Cryptosporidium. This micro-organism is very much more tolerant of the action of disinfectants
than faecal indicators such as E. coli because it forms resistant spore-like bodies called oocysts.
If disinfection is the sole treatment process used, the numbers of Cryptosporidium oocysts will
remain unchanged whereas the numbers of E. coli may be reduced to undetectable levels. UV Disinfection with a pre-filter will remove oocysts from water.</p)

Treatment: Multi Barrier Approach

UV Disinfection is the treatment method of choice for most owners of a private water supply. This highly effective method of treatment does not alter the taste of the water, nor does it use chemicals

A 5 micron UV pre-filter will remove much of the particulate material present in water, which, if not removed, could otherwise reduce the effectiveness of UV disinfection by creating an oxidant demand and/or shielding microbes from the effects of the disinfectant. This is a good example of why a multiple rather than a single barrier approach is preferred. In addition, the use of multiple barriers will allow some protection to remain even if one process fails.

UV Disinfection

UV Disinfection made by Daro


Acknowledgement: The primary source of information whilst preparing this document is Drinking Water Regulator in Scotland (DWRS).

Will the selling price of my property be affected if I don’t get my water sorted?

Will the selling price of my property be affected if I don’t get my water sorted?

In the letter that many Councils now send to households that have failed their compulsory water test, the EHO’s (Environmental Health Officers) include the following paragraph “Enforcement action may be taken where the (Private Water Supply) Regulations are breached. We also alert prospective purchasers during searches prior to buying property to any danger or lack of serviced treatment equipment”. So yes, the price of your property will be affected if you don’t do something about your water.

buying or selling a property with a spring or borehole

buying or selling a property with a spring or borehole

What are the risks associated with drinking un-filtered spring water?

What are the risks associated with drinking un-filtered spring water?

Diarrhoea, stomach cramp, high temperature

Diarrhoea, stomach cramp, high temperature nausea, headaches and drowsiness are some of the symptoms that can develop after drinking contaminated water. The worst cases can result in kidney failure. The most recent research into private water supplies (Risebro 2012) confirms that over 50% of private water supplies pose a significant health risk. The research identified an incidence of diarrhoea 5 times higher than normal

Children under 10 most vulnerable

Children under 10 years old and visitors are most at risk of becoming ill from drinking water from a private water supply. The findings apply equally to springs and boreholes.

Drinking water from a private water supply can cause diarrhoea and vomiting

Drinking water from a private water supply can cause diarrhoea and vomiting